Sunday, 11 June 2017

The dishonesty of the Guardian

Jonathon Freedman is a filthy zionist apologist who was responsible for the sacking on Nafeez Ahmed.

Shame on the Guardian!

Jonathan Freedland’s Corbyn Apology


Off-Guardian,

10 June, 2017


In an attempt to restore some his fast-disappearing credibility, Jonathan Freedland gives a half-hearted, over-qualified apology to Jeremy Corbyn. It’s self-serving, dishonest, and far more revealing than he meant it to be.



Following the surprising (to some) election result, the Guardian has seen their big-name Op-Ed writers desperately trying to claw-back their credibility. For those of us who could see, and understand, the real support that Labour have been gaining in the two years since Corbyn was elected it has been amusing to watch.

Jonathan Freedland’s damp article tries to both rewrite the author’s history, morally justifying his outrageous bias, claim he was right all along and undermine the electoral result. In trying do all this it not only falls between two stools, but face-plants straight into a third.

Freedland on pre-election predictions:
barring a couple of polls dismissed as rogue outliers, nothing suggested that Theresa May was about to throw away her parliamentary majority.”
This demonstrates the dangerous insulation of the Westminster “bubble”. It was palpable, given the progress of the campaigns, that any fair vote was going to be much, much closer than headlines declared. It was obvious to anyone watching Theresa May scream her “policies” out into the world from a motorway lay by, in front of pre-approved reporters and paid supporters waving signs, that she would struggle. Comparing that to the spectacle of Corbyn speaking to thousands of people in packed town centres all across the country was startling.

The distance between reality and the world of the media is becoming frighteningly wide. They seem genuinely surprised when the real world doesn’t correspond with the lies they tweet at each other, the myths the publish and the dreams they print. It’s moving from dishonesty into schizophrenia at this point.
Freedland on his “opposition” to Corbyn:
I opposed Jeremy Corbyn when he first stood for the Labour leadership in 2015, and thereafter, and I did so on two grounds. First, on principle: I was troubled by his foreign policy worldview, with its indulgence of assorted authoritarian regimes, and by what I perceived as his willingness to look past antisemitism on the left. But more immediate was an assessment of his basic electability. I wanted the Tories gone, and simply did not believe Labour could pose a serious electoral threat under Corbyn.
Firstly, he did not “oppose” Jeremy Corbyn – he attacked him, smeared him and slandered him. As did everyone else at his paper. And everyone else in the media. And everyone else in Westminster. The whole political establishment united against the man, including his own party. The Prime Minister called for his resignation during PMQs.

The reasons Freedland gives for taking part in this undignified pile-on are as self-serving as they are false.

Regarding “foreign policy” – appearing on Iranian TV [Freedland’s cited example] is hardly endorsing autocracy. Certainly it can’t be as bad as selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, or Israel, or training terrorist proxies in Jordan to kill people in Syria. Government backed crimes which never seem to trouble Freedland.

That a man who cheered on illegal Imperialist wars, and subsequent crimes against humanity, in Libya and Syria can dare take up the moral high ground over a non-interventionist, one who has been proven correct time after time, is sickening.

Antisemitism on the left is almost entirely fictional. A McCarthyite tactic used to deflect all criticism of Israel, or Zionism in general. Freedland is no stranger to this tactic.

As for “electability”? It is a nonsense concept. An invention of a fake-left wing media to bash a man whose actual policies were beyond condemnation, whilst maintaining their illusory “liberal” label.
Freedland on the election:
Lest we forget, it was not enough. Labour still lost, even when faced with the weakest Tory campaign in at least 40 years.
Even when he is attempting to be contrite, he can’t take responsibility for his role in this. He doesn’t mention his attacks, and those of other journalists and neo-liberals, as (deliberately) handicapping Labour’s campaign before it even started. 

He doesn’t mention the attempted PLP coup that destroyed Labour’s cohesion at a time when a united alternative would have posed a huge threat to an unstable Tory government.

Part of the reason the shambolic Tory campaign was able to limit Labour gains to 32 seats, is that they were starting from a position of massive strength – gifted to them by Red Tories in the press and MPs more concerned with remaining part of the in-crowd than trying to better society.

Corbyn was hobbled and undermined at every turn, presented with an almost impossible task…and, even so, he nearly pulled it off. This deserves more than a grudging half-apology, it deserves genuine respect.

Freedland and his ilk will give Corbyn neither.

The truth is, the reason Freedland opposed Corbyn, and will continue do so even as he insincerely tries to win-over his increasingly estranged leftwing readership, is that he doesn’t want socialism anywhere near government.

Freedland doesn’t want to “get rid of the Tories”, he wants to rebrand them. He wants Tory economic policy under a false-flag of “liberal values” and drenched in fake progress. He wants equally low pay for everyone, and to make sure racial minorities have fair access to food banks.

He’s wealthy, and perfectly happy to let poverty spread and to sell off the NHS and look-on as society crumble, he just wants to do it from a position of faux-concern.

That’s the legacy of Blairism, it appealed to people who are self-centred capitalist me-firsters at heart, but who want to hide behind a mask of social conscience. 
The same kind of people who want to go to war to protect peace. Who bomb to save lives. Who can say or do anything whilst maintaining their pristine self-image and snow-white conscience.

The real point of this election is that people voted for Corbyn even though Freedland, and everyone like him, kept telling them not to. That every concern-trolling phony-liberal earnestly claiming to be “troubled by Corbyn’s unelectability” was largely ignored.

People don’t really listen to “journalists” anymore, and this sort of self-serving dishonesty is the reason why



Dump the Guardian!

Support non-corporate media


The Guardian has spent the last 2 years relentlessly attacking Jeremy Corbyn. Only recently has it changed its tune, perhaps worried that it has alienated too many readers. Corbyn's success has been despite the Guardian and the rest of the mainstream media. It's very likely that the Guardian will want readers to forget its propaganda war on Corbyn. We've compiled this list so readers don't forget. 

Dump the Guardian!

xVan Badham
12 May 2017
Labour has a chance if it replaces Corbyn. Look at Australia in 1983
 2,899 Shares
xJonathan Freedland
5 May 2017
No more excuses: Jeremy Corbyn is to blame for this meltdown
 20,860 Shares

xPolly Toynbee
19 April 2017
Corbyn is rushing to embrace Labour’s annihilation
 5,239 Shares

21 March 2017
The Guardian view on Labour: not up to the job
 672 Shares

xNick Cohen
19 March 2017
Don’t tell me you weren’t warned about Corbyn
 17,179 Shares

xOwen Jones
1 March 2017

Jeremy Corbyn says he’s staying. That’s not good enough
 12,539 Shares

xJonathan Freedland
25 February 2017
Copeland shows Corbyn must go. But only Labour’s left can remove him
 5,414 Shares

xSuzanne Moore
11 January 2017
Labour’s Corbyn reboot shows exactly why he has to go
 6,670 Shares

xGaby Hinsliff
6 January 2017
Jeremy Corbyn is just a symptom of a party that doesn’t get why it lost
 3,910 Shares

xNick Cohen
1 October 2016
Good and brave Labour MPs need to be defended
 2,541 Shares
xPolly Toynbee
27 September 2016
Why can’t I get behind Corbyn, when we want the same things? Here’s why
 6,949 Shares

xSuzanne Moore
13 July 2016
Corbyn’s uselessness has lost its charm, but he’s not Labour’s only problem
 3,435 Shares

xPolly Toynbee
25 June 2016
Dismal, lifeless, spineless – Jeremy Corbyn let us down again
 12,386 Shares

xJonathan Freedland
12 February 2016
I’ve felt the Bern. And Jeremy Corbyn, you’re no Senator Sanders
 1,551 Shares

xNick Cohen
5 December 2015
Corbyn’s ‘new politics’ means the self-righteous left wallows in its cruelty
 8,801 Shares

xJonathan Freedland
27 November 2015
href="https://blockads.fivefilters.org/go.php?With each misstep, Jeremy Corbyn is handing Britain to the Tories
 10,967 Shares

xSuzanne Moore
16 September 2015
Corbyn's Labour is a party without a point, led by a rebel with a cause
 5,808 Shares

xTony Blair
13 August 2015
Tony Blair: Even if you hate me, please don’t take Labour over the cliff edge
 28,549 Shares
  Guardian Editorial
13 August 2015
The Guardian view on Labour’s choice: Corbyn has shaped the campaign, but Cooper can shape the future
 8,557 Shares

xPolly Toynbee
4 August 2015
Free to dream, I’d be left of Jeremy Corbyn. But we can’t gamble the future on him
 7,963 Shares

xMichael White
30 July 2015
Jeremy Corbyn: is the world ready for his sandals and socks?
 1,555 Shares
xAnne Perkins
22 July 2015
Labour party members, please think before you vote for Jeremy Corbyn
 5,998 Shares

xNick Cohen
18 July 2015

Dump the Guardian!

No comments:

Post a Comment